Palamedes

Cicero’s ‘Political Programme’ in the 'Pro Roscio Amerino'

2023/2024, TOM 15

Piotr Berdowski

0000-0002-9162-303X

University of Rzeszów, Faculty of Humanities, Institute of History, Department of Ancient and Oriental History

Publication date

06.09.2026

Publishing model

open access

License type

CC BY 4.0 Int.

Field

Humanities

Discipline

archeology, literary studies, culture and religion studies, arts studies, history

Language of publication

English

Downloads

PDF 503 KB

Article

Number of views:7

Number of downloads:3

Crossref citations:0

Altmetric score:0

Abstract

The speech 'Pro Roscio Amerino', delivered by Cicero in 80 BCE, is considered his de facto debut as an orator and an exceptionally successful one. Cicero spoke before quaestio de sicariis et veneficiis in defence of Roscius of Ameria, accused of patricide. Beyond its legal aspects, this speech also served as a political critique of the Sullan state, with subtle yet pointed references to Sulla himself. Employing a wide range of rhetorical devices, Cicero outlined a vision for the reform of the Republic, including calls for the restoration of the rule of law and moral renewal. In particular, he devoted significant attention to the role of the nobilitas, often adopting a critical tone. This paper offers a comprehensive analysis of Cicero’s critique of the Sullan regime and his proposed framework for the Republic’s restoration as expressed in 'Pro Roscio Amerino'.

Keywords:

Cicero,Sulla,Sullan state,Pro Roscio Amerino,Roman oratory,nobilitas

Bibliography

Alexander, M.C. 2002: The case for the prosecution in the Ciceronian era, Ann Arbor.

Allen, W. 1952: ‘Cicero’s Provincial Governorship in 63 B.C.’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 83, 233–241.

Axer, J. 1989: ‘Tribunal-Stage-Arena: Modelling of the Communication Situation in M. Tullius Cicero’s Judicial Speeches’, Rhetorica. A Journal of the History of Rhetoric 7, 299–311.

Badian, E. 1958: Foreign clientelae (264–70 B.C.), Oxford.

Badian, E. 1962: ‘From the Gracchi to Sulla (1940–59)’, Historia 11, 197–245.

Barden Dowling, M. 2000: ‘The clemency of Sulla’, Historia 49, 303–340.

Batstone, W.W. 1994: ‘Cicero’s Construction of Consular Ethos in the First Catilinarian’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 124, 211–266.

Berdowski, P. 2024: ‘Głos w obronie cycerońskiej narracji o wybawcy republiki’ [‘A voice defending the Ciceronian narrative as the saviour of the Republic’], Przegląd Historyczny, 115, 301–342.

Bernard, E. (ed.) 2011: Rome, la dernière République. Recueil d’articles de François Hinard (Ausonius Éditions. Scripta Antiqua, 32), Bordeaux.

Berry, D.H. 2004: ‘The Publication of Cicero’s Pro Roscio Amerino’, Mnemosyne 57, 80–87.

Berry, D.H. 2000: Cicero, Defence speeches. Translated with introductions and notes by D.H. Berry (Oxford World’s Classics), Oxford, New York.

Booth, J. (ed.) 2007: Cicero on the Attack: Invective and Subversion in the Orations and Beyond, Oxford.

Buchheit, V. 1975: ‘Ciceros Kritik an Sulla in der Rede für Roscius aus Ameria’, Historia 24, 570–591.

Burton, P. 2014: The Revolt of Lepidus (cos. 78 BC) Revisited, Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte 63, 404–421.

Corbeill, A. 2002: ‘Ciceronian invective’, in May, J.M. (ed.), Brill’s Companion to Cicero: Oratory and Rhetoric, Leiden, Boston, 198–217.

Craig, C. 2004: ‘Audience Expectations, Invective, and Proof’, in Powell, J, Paterson J. (eds), Cicero the Advocate, Oxford, 187–213.

Craig, C. 2007: ‘Cicero as orator’, in Dominik, W.J., Hall, J. (ed.), A Companion to Roman Rhetoric, Malden Mass., 264–284.

Craig, C. 2010: ‘Means and ends of indignatio in Cicero’s Pro Roscio Amerino’, in Berry, D.H., Erskine, A. (eds), Form and function in Roman oratory, Cambridge, 75–91.

Crawford, J. 2002: ‘The lost and fragmentary orations’, in May, J.M. (ed.), Brill’s Companion to Cicero: Oratory and Rhetoric, Leiden, Boston, 305–330.

Crawford, J.W. 1984: M. Tullius Cicero: the lost and unpublished orations (Hypomnemata: Untersuchungen zur Antike und ihrem Nachleben, Heft 80), Göttingen.

Dugan, J.R. 2005: Making a New Man: Ciceronian Self-fashioning in the Rhetorical Works, Oxford.

Dyck, A.R. 2003: ‘Evidence and Rhetoric in Cicero’s Pro Roscio Amerino: The Case Against Sex. Roscius’, The Classical Quarterly (New Series) 53, 235–246.

Eckert, A. 2015: ‘Remembering Cultural Trauma: Sulla’s Proscriptions, Roman Responses, and Christian Perspectives’, in Becker, E.-M., Dochhorn, J., Holt, E. (eds), Trauma and Traumatization in Individual and Collective Dimensions, Göttingen, 262–274.

Eckert, A. 2018: ‘Good fortune and the public good: Disputing Sulla’s claim to be Felix’, in van der Blom, H., Gray, C., Steel, C. (eds), Institutions and ideology in Republican Rome: Speech, audience and decision, Cambridge, 283–298.

Ferrary, J.-L. 1991: ‘Lex Cornelia de sicariis et veneficis’, Athenaeum 79, 417–434.

Gabba, E. 1964: ‘M. Livio Druso e le riforme di Silla’, Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa. Lettere, Storia e Filosofia 33, 1–15.

Gruen, E.S. 1968: Roman politics and the criminal courts, 149–78 B.C., Cambridge, Mass.

Hall, J. 2013: ‘Saviour of the Republic and Father of the Fatherland: Cicero and political crisis’, in Steel, C. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Cicero, Cambridge, 215–230.

Hall, J. 2014: Cicero’s Use of Judicial Theater, Ann Arbor.

Harries, B. 2007: ‘Acting the part: techniques of the comic stage in Cicero’s early speeches’, in Booth, J. (es.), Cicero on the Attack: Invective and Subversion in the Orations and Beyond, Oxford, 129–147.

Hinard, F. 1984: ‘La naissance du mythe de Sylla’, Revue des Études Latines 62, 81–97.

Hinard, F. 1985: Les proscriptions de la Rome républicaine (Collection de l’École française de Rome, 83), Roma.

Hinard, F. 2006: ‘Notice’, in Cicéron, Discours. Tome I–2e partie. Pour Sextus Roscius. Texte établi, trad. et commenté par François Hinard, notes de Yasmina Benferhat (Collection des universités de France Série latine, 384), Paris, VII–CVII.

Hinard, F. 2011a: ‘Sur les liberi proscriptorum. Approches prosopographique et juridique d’un problème politique’, in Bernard, E. (ed.), Rome, la dernière République. Recueil d’articles de François Hinard (Ausonius Éditions. Scripta Antiqua, 32), Bordeaux, 99–115.

Hinard, F. 2011b: ‘L. Cornelius Chrysogonus et la portée politique du pro Roscio Amerino’, in Bernard, E. (ed.), Rome, la dernière République. Recueil d’articles de François Hinard (Ausonius Éditions. Scripta Antiqua, 32), Bordeaux, 203–205.

Hinard, F. 2011c: ‘La male mort. Exécutions et statut du corps au moment de la première proscription’, in Bernard, E. (ed.), Rome, la dernière République. Recueil d’articles de François Hinard (Ausonius Éditions. Scripta Antiqua, 32), Bordeaux, 85–98.

Humbert, J. 1925: Les plaidoyers écrits et les plaidoiries réelles de Cicéron, Paris.

Imholtz, A.A. 1972: ‘Gladiatorial Metaphors in Cicero’s “Pro Sex. Roscio Amerino”’, The Classical World 65, 228–230.

Kaster, R.A. 2006: Cicero. Speech on behalf of Publius Sestius (Clarendon Ancient History Series), Oxford, New York.

Kinsey, T.E. 1980: ‘Cicero’s Case against Magnus Capito and Chrysogonus in the Pro Sex. Roscio Amerino and its Use for the Historian’, L’Antiquité Classique 49, 173–190.

Kinsey, T.E. 1982: ‘The political insignificance of Cicero’s Pro Roscio’, Liverpool Classical Monthly 7, 39–40.

Kinsey, T.E. 1985: ‘The Case against Sextus Roscius of Ameria’, L’Antiquité Classique 54, 188–196.

Kinsey, T.E. 1975: ‘Cicero’s speech for Roscius of Ameria’, Symbolae Osloenses 50, 91–104.

Kumaniecki, K. 1959: Cyceron i jego współcześni [Cicero and his contemporaries], Warszawa.

Laffi, U. 1967a: ‘Il mito di Silla. Parte I’, Athenaeum 45, 177–213.

Laffi, U. 1967b: ‘Il mito di Silla. Parte II’, Athenaeum 45, 255–277.

Lange, C.H. 2018: ‘Cassius Dio on Violence, Stasis, and Civil War: the Early Years’, in Burden-Strevens C., Lindholmer M.O. (eds), Cassius Dio’s Forgotten History of Early Rome (Historiography of Rome and Its Empire Series, 3), Leiden, 165–189.

Levene, D.S. 2004: ‘Reading Cicero’s Narratives’, in Powell, J., Paterson J. (eds), Cicero the Advocate, Oxford, 117–146.

Lintott, A.W. 1968: Violence in Republican Rome, Oxford.

May, J.M. 2002: Cicero: his life and career, in May, J.M. (ed.), Brill’s Companion to Cicero: Oratory and Rhetoric, Leiden, Boston, 1–21.

May, J.M. (ed.) 2002: Brill’s Companion to Cicero: Oratory and Rhetoric, Leiden, Boston.

Meier, C. 1980: Res publica amissa: eine Studie zu Verfassung und Geschichte der späten römischen Republik, Frankfurt am Main.

Miączewska, A.B. 2013: ‘Good General Becoming Evil Tyrant: the Deconstruction of the Sullan Topos’, in Słapek, D., Łuć, I. (eds), Lucius Cornelius Sulla: history and tradition, Lublin, 191–212.

Mitchell, T.N. 1979: Cicero, the ascending years, New Haven.

Opelt, I. 1965: Die lateinische Schimpfwörter und verwandte sprachliche Erscheinungen, Heidelberg.

Powell, J.G.F. 2007: Invective and the orator: Ciceronian theory and practice, in Booth, J. (eds), Cicero on the Attack: Invective and Subversion in the Orations and Beyond, Oxford, 1–23.

Ramage, E.S. 1991: ‘Sulla’s Propaganda’, Klio 73, 93–121.

Riess, W., Fagan, G.G. (eds) 2016: The topography of violence in the Greco-Roman world, Ann Arbor.

Rosenblitt, J.A. 2014: ‘The Turning Tide: The Politics of the Year 79 B.C.E.’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 144, 415–444.

Rosenblitt, J.A. 2019: Rome after Sulla, London.

Seager, R. 2007: ‘Ciceronian invective: thames and variations’, in Booth, J. (ed.), Cicero on the Attack: Invective and Subversion in the Orations and Beyond, Oxford, 25–46.

Solmsen, F. 1938: ‘Cicero’s First Speeches: A Rhetorical Analysis’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 69, 542–556.

Steel, C. 2013: ‘Cicero, oratory and public life’, in Steel, C. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Cicero, Cambridge, 160–170.

Steel, C. (eds) 2013: The Cambridge Companion to Cicero, Cambridge.

Stroh, W. 1975: Taxis und Taktik: Die advokatische Dispositionskunst in Ciceros Gerichtsreden, Stuttgart.

Thein, A. 2017: ‘Percussores: a study in Sullan violence’, Tyche 32, 235–250.

Vasaly, A. 1985: ‘The Masks of Rhetoric: Cicero’s Pro Roscio Amerino’, Rhetorica. A Journal of the History of Rhetoric 3, 1–20.

Vervaet, F.J. 2018: ‘The Date, Modalities and Legacy of Sulla’s Abdication of his Dictatorship: a Study in Sullan Statecraft’, Studia Historica: Historia Antigua 36, 31–82.

Volk, K. 2013: ‘The Genre of Cicero’s De consulatu suo’, in Papanghelis, T.D., Harrison, S.J., Frangoulidis, S.A. (eds), Generic interfaces in Latin literature: encounters, interactions and transformations, Berlin, Boston, 93–112.

Volk, K., Zetzel, J.E.G. 2015: ‘Laurel, tongue and glory (Cicero, De consvlatv svo fr. 6 Soubiran)’, The Classical Quarterly 65, 204–223.

Wiseman, T.P. 1971: New men in the Roman senate, 139 B.C. – A.D. 14, London.

Yan, T. 1981: ‘Parricidium’, Mélanges de l’Ecole française de Rome. Antiquité 93, 643–715.

Zetzel, J.E.G. 2013: ‘A Contract on Ameria: Law and Legality in Cicero’s “Pro Roscio Amerino”’, The American Journal of Philology 134, 425–444.